Jan Crawford Greenburg - The Supreme Court and Bush v. Gore

	Duration: 05:01 minutes Upload Time: 07-02-19 13:12:42 User: ForaTv :::: Favorites
Description: Complete video at: http://fora.tv/fora/showthread.php?t=642 Legal analyst Jan Crawford Greenburg discusses the lasting impact on the U.S. Supreme Court of "Bush v. Gore," the historic decision that determined the outcome of the 2000 presidential election. ----- Jan Crawford Greenburg talks about "Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States." Drawing on unprecedented access to the Supreme Court justices, acclaimed ABC News legal correspondent Jan Greenburg offers an explosive account of the struggle to control the Supreme Court and the direction of the United States.
Comments
FallenTabris ::: Favorites Informative. thank you. 07-03-13 07:37:55 _____________________________________________________
gibbsale ::: Favorites This simply confirms that Greenburg is a conservative lapdog. She talks about the "liberal justices" accepting a states rights argument. No mention of the lack of citation in the majority opinion, or that the Court confined their decision to the facts of Bush v. Gore. No mention of the fact that Stevens and Souter were Republican appointments. No mention of the fact that the equal protection argument was broad even by liberal standards. 07-03-19 16:54:15 _____________________________________________________
markotraco ::: Favorites The equal protection decision was 7-2. 07-06-16 20:12:24 _____________________________________________________
icarusinbrazil ::: Favorites Is this woman directly related to Katherine Harris? 07-05-28 00:21:34 _____________________________________________________
billybillfat ::: Favorites In Bush v. Gore, the equal protection argument was laughably flawed - it is an irrelevant distraction to note that "wow, the conservatives were making an equal protection argument", and it is simply stupid to follow it up with "and gee, the liberal justices were making a states' rights argument - I guess this means it was all political"!!! Jan Crawford Greenburg is a lightweight, and her book was not very good. 07-06-08 15:24:55 _____________________________________________________
2ndPistonHonda ::: Favorites do you not agree that if a state holds a recount, that the entire state should be recounted and not select counties? 07-07-21 01:52:23 _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
JoinedJustToSayThis ::: Favorites A 5 minute speech without one single piece of evidence or proven fact. Is this to be considered an "intelligent" argument? 07-08-11 01:51:06 _____________________________________________________