BBC Reports Live that WTC7 has fallen, yet it still stands

	Duration: 04:54 minutes Upload Time: 2007-02-26 22:53:12 User: DiamondsAreTheBest :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day
Description: BBC's public response on Wed 2/28: LINK: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/02/part_of_the_conspiracy.html www.STOPROSIEENDAMERICA.com 1. We're not part of a conspiracy. Nobody told us what to say or do on September 11th. We didn't get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn't receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening. 2. In the chaos and confusion of the day, I'm quite sure we said things which turned out to be untrue or inaccurate - but at the time were based on the best information we had. We did what we always did - sourced our reports, used qualifying words like "apparently" or "it's reported" or "we're hearing" and constantly tried to check and double check the information we were receiving. 3. Our reporter Jane Standley was in New York on the day of the attacks, and like everyone who was there, has the events seared on her mind. I've spoken to her today and unsurprisingly, she doesn't remember minute-by-minute what she said or did - like everybody else that day she was trying to make sense of what she was seeing; what she was being told; and what was being told to her by colleagues in London who were monitoring feeds and wires services. 4. We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I'd love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don't help clear up the issue one way or another. 5. If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error - no more than that. As one of the comments on You Tube says today "so the guy in the studio didn't quite know what was going on? Woah, that totally proves conspiracy... " HA! THEY say they lost the tapes from the single most important news day of our generation! They lost the 9/11 tapes HAHAH! That's hilarously absurd. ------ Someone on the inside was either trying to blow the whistle, or they had really shakey boots while engaging in this day's "false flag" event. I must say, the more we uncover, the more we see how incredibly sloppy they really were in trying to fool the world into thinking we have a "new enemy". I guess you can't blame the neo cons for trying, I mean after Russia fell, what choice did they have? "Oh! I know! How about we create a fake enemy?!" "Give that man a metal! How would you like to have a seat on the NYSE?!? Or how about a #3 position at CIA!?" At this point you just have you laugh your ass off at the absurdity of it all. At least we have those Democrats to save us! HAHAH! LOL!
Comments
AMERSIDD ::: Favorites how on earth did the BBC report the collapse of Building 7 before it happened? Psychic clairvoyance? Of course they were told that WTC 7 was coming down, just like the firefighters, police, first responders and CNN were told it was coming down. They had to have had a source for making such a claim. The BBC is acting like the naughty little boy who got caught with his hand in the cookie jar!! 07-08-12 17:34:06 __________________________________________________
DiamondsAreTheBest ::: Favorites When LOOSE CHANGE FINAL CUT comes out this year, you will also see footage of this controlled demolition going off. They have exclusive footage for all to see. It's like a firework display from within the building. You can also click on my name and watch: "World Trade Center 7 - explained (HQ)" 07-05-18 02:12:21 __________________________________________________
DiamondsAreTheBest ::: Favorites Because the conspirators are criminal elements in the US gov't. They orchestrated the entire event from WTC7 - they had to blow it up. 07-04-28 13:22:28 __________________________________________________
wargeb ::: Favorites Too bad you haven't answered ONE of Veleeta's questions. A:Why would the conspirators "leak" their plan to the press? B: Why would explosives be put into a building that WASN"T hit by a plane? How would they know WT7 would be hit by debris, providing the "cover" to blow it up? Answer THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 07-04-26 11:57:28 __________________________________________________
doosher ::: Favorites I think some people need to understand how the media works before making their blind comments. A lot of mistakes are made in 24 news channels because of the pressures to be first and to keep things moving. I don't like it but it happens. This is incompetence more than anything, but I'm sure none of you perfect beings never make mistakes. 07-04-26 06:00:02 __________________________________________________
raisin37 ::: Favorites Just forget that stuff. I'll re-read AND re-listen and get on point. sorry 07-04-26 01:31:16 __________________________________________________
raisin37 ::: Favorites I'm as big of a CT as anybody, but that a lot of light for 5:30 am. 07-04-26 01:22:30 __________________________________________________
seapoidog ::: Favorites Saying, "I was THERE..." and calling me names proves nothing. That is hearsay, not proof. Calling people names just shows you have no facts to back up your claims, thus you have resorted to such juvenile behaviour. 07-04-25 18:16:44 __________________________________________________
DiamondsAreTheBest ::: Favorites "Veleetanose" is clearly having difficulty wth reality. And sheepl like him have nothing to base their rants on - it's just IDIOT this and STUPID that. Right Velveetanose? It's citizens like you that let them get away with it. 07-04-25 17:17:09 __________________________________________________
cromagnon35 ::: Favorites Unfortunately, they're a bit more believable BECAUSE it's from a foreign news organization. I hate to agree with Rosie, but your really do have to go outside our country to find the unslanted truth about what's going on inside it. This posting is pretty damning IMHO. Search on "North American Union" to connect the dots on WHY they would do this. Unlike other conspiricy theories, there's an abundance of evidence and expert opinion substantiating it. 07-04-25 14:45:50 __________________________________________________