Duration: 54 seconds Upload Time: 06-09-11 17:50:54 User: LiberalViewer :::: Favorites |
|
Description:
ABC's docudrama, "The Path to 9/11," provides the 13 second FAIR USE clip that begs the question: Has Product Placement Gone Too Far? ;-) |
|
Comments | |
dreambig ::: Favorites From someone who does Product integration for a living. That does not look like it was paid for. It may be but doesn't look like it. Consider this: What company would pay say $300,000 to $750,000 to have some stupid actor playing a terrorist say Casio once, while not even showing the product. Not likely. But media companies pay for stupid things all the time. 06-11-28 16:22:36 _____________________________________________________ | |
noraklagrangian ::: Favorites Casio didn't pay those people. Very many terrorists use Casios not because they're special in any way but because they are widely available, cheap, and reliable. Many also come with many functions that may be useful, such as countdown timer, alarm, and compass. 07-01-12 11:03:11 _____________________________________________________ | |
jedaaa ::: Favorites i get what your saying but perhaps you could have found a better clip to make your point. but hay 07-01-15 18:05:21 _____________________________________________________ | |
firemanr ::: Favorites PLEASE DON'T READ THIS. You will get kissed on the nearest possible Friday by the love of your life. Tomorrow will be the best day of your life. However, if you don't post this comment to at least 3 videos, you will die within 2 days. Copy and paste this, to be saved 07-03-29 13:51:07 _____________________________________________________ | |
mstock626 ::: Favorites Too funny. I guess General Mills didn't get into the mix....watch Part II, Section 15, where the guy on United 93's wife is definitely NOT holding a box of "Cheerios"! Somehow that they couldn't get a real box of Cheerios just kind of jarred me. 07-04-09 21:06:50 _____________________________________________________ | |
mongobobo ::: Favorites Yeah, I thought that was one of the most bizarre product placement ads I've ever seen. 07-06-21 22:35:27 _____________________________________________________ | |
mongobobo ::: Favorites I thought it was very well scripted and shot. The cinemetography was very stylish and the editing was top notch. Of course, if there are fallacies in the material that is not good. But as far as good television, two thumbs up for me. 07-06-21 22:48:27 _____________________________________________________ | |
mongobobo ::: Favorites I think his point was about excessive advertising like product placement. I mean, do we really need McDonalds ads plastered all over the place? Does any ever wake up in this country and forget that McDonalds is still around? 07-06-21 22:50:38 _____________________________________________________ | |
enestesio ::: Favorites Good television is fine, but so much easier to watch when it doesn't toy with our accepted notions of integrity, decency, honesty ... Mr. Cheney, Mr. Gonzalez, the Roberts court's contentious decisions: these people and those of their ilk put "the world's leading democracy" in a delicate position when they appear to act more in their own self-interest than in the interest of the common good. 07-06-22 14:07:39 _____________________________________________________ | |
glorianasoccernymphw ::: Favorites Check out this FREE adult dating website... ANONPROFILE dot COM 07-07-26 07:31:02 _____________________________________________________ |
Monday, July 30, 2007
Has Product Placement Gone Too Far in ABC's Path to 9/11?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment